The £25-35 per head of population at first seems generous, but the devil is in the detail, as the figure is for “running costs”. It is still unclear exactly what proportion of this figure is for management costs. PCT management costs in 08/09 (click here for Government source) were £1.4Bn, covering a population of circa 60M equates to £23 / head, research by the Lib Dems pre election put the figure at £28 / head, (HSJ) if we assume an average of £25 / head, and also take into account the 09/10 revised operating framework instruction that PCT management costs should not exceed 66% of 08/09 costs then should GPs be working on budgets for buying management support of roughly £16 / head of population? A consortia will arguably need 40% less in terms of heads, as they will not inherit some statutory PCT functions, key functional roles such as Finance Directors may be shared between consortia, and GPs are doing the commissioning themselves, all of which should mean there is room in the budget to buy in interim support where it might be needed.
I’d be interested to hear the thoughts of our interim community - has anyone else had similar findings when crunching the numbers? Can anyone provide additional insight into how consortia will buy in support and the expected costs will be? Will most consortia go out to tender and enter into 1-5 year contracts with providers of management support, be they ex PCT staff in social enterprises, niche consultancies or private companies? Will the market for interims be into these providers rather than directly into consortia? Your thoughts as ever are appreciated
Steve Melber is Senior Consultant, Health at Interim Partners
To ensure your blog response is published please provide your first and second name together with an email address that matches the one you used when registering on the IP site. Blog responses will only be published if we can identify who you are and/or that you are registered with Interim Partners. Please click here if you wish to register